My good rep in Toronto Three In A Box., produces a themed promotional book every year aimed at certain segments of the market. These books are branded as ‘Box Lunches’ and the current one is the fourth. Anyhuff, the theme this time is ‘Childhood’ and the attached pic is my contribution. I never saw myself as a children’s book illustrator so when I told Denis Goodbody of Adept Advertising he expressed surprise. He’s right, of course. Certainly what I do engages with the child inside of the reader -even at the level of the business/financial work that I do. Furthermore, my own lovely wife consistently points out my childish behaviour. Consider that we all grew up in our pre-school years with picture-books being our chief means of getting the sense out of print. We all have these absurd self-images and it’s about time we burst them. Perhaps we can meet up and burst each other’s absurd self-images. Say, next Wednesday? Good. see you then.
I enjoyed this project immensely. Obviously, you can’t have too many robots.
Kevin the Magnificent,
King of all the ‘bots,
He has multitude of them
(that means lots and lots)
They spring out of his picture-books,
And from amongst the toys,
To do their monarch’s bidding,
(That means lots of noise).
Who knows; it may go on to form part of a book itself…hmmm…
Last Friday saw me arrive into the Anna Livia studios for an interview with Alex Gibson on his show, ‘The Persuaders’ -a weekly marketing and media programme. The Persuaders. It was a good chance to get an inside view of the wireless -all those wires! The interview covered my beginnings as an illustrator and my part in the birth of the Illustrators Guild of Ireland. I had my portfolio with me and Alex described a selection to the audience. Hang on -I *was* asked… A case of a thousand words painting one picture. There’s an audio file available on my site [just under 7Mb]. Just to keep with the subject matter, I’m not going to include a picture.
This is the image that went into today’s Personal Finance section of Business This Week. The article it accompanies is about the upcoming SSIA accounts coming to fruition and the enormous amounts of bureaucracy associated with realising them. In fact it wasn’t the idea that I first proposed to the editor -which was simply a wrapped gift, completely bound up in red tape and a dismayed person looking at it. That would have done, I suppose -but it wouldn’t have been one that inspired a double-take! I preferred to do this “Boys’ Own’ version, complete with skull and poised cobra. Far more manly. Harumph.
I’ve often heard it said [and usually by magazine publishers] that they won’t use illustration because ‘… we can get photographs far cheaper on the web’. I take that to mean they’ll use anything that’s cheap and instantaneous. It doesn’t appear to me to be an ethos that will improve standards. First, they probably won’t get what they’re looking for, and insert an image that is ‘along the lines of what we want, but it’ll do…’. Secondly, photography and illustration are mutually distinct and serve different purposes. Photography is a reflection of one instant in time. It shows what is, or the actuality of the subject [like a portrait]. Illustration -we could call it artwork- encompasses the subject but expresses it in a unique way, takes the viewer into a different world -the world of the bizarre, perhaps, where anything can happen. Good editorial illustration should draw viewers in and make them return for further viewings.
I presume the same editors wouldn’t use copy that nearly says what they want it to say…or would they? Magazines full of reworked press releases, anybody?